Відео

Should've gone for the design patents in first case

Wow … such a cool and illuminating video … thank you ❤

Thank you . This was really valuable

Intervention quand il le faut

I hope.you get back into making videos and still read chat. A video on Tesla would be good because they focus on product and service and open patent agreement.

I would Ike to see a video on Ford and Tesla. Ford holds the most innovations in the form of patents in cars. While Tesla makes a lot of f patents in car design open or free. Does that make Tesla the most over inflated stock in the car market. There the only two major car manufacturers to never be bailed out by the US government. The interesting thing about Ford and the GFC is they survived. We're they receiving royalties from other car manufacturers when other manufacturers were having defaults on there finance operations. If so what would happen to Tesla if we went through another financial crisis. Tesla now have starlink how does that work is erikson claiming the mobile phone royalties on that. Also IBM being the company with the most patents and doesn't even produce end products and services it just focuses on innovation and design invention. Your really good at making videos I would like to hear some input on these companies.

Hi, I have some basic question and it's appreciated that you or someone could answer it, suppose I invent a drawer - furniture, 1, should I write mounting the screws process, the drawer will use screw but common screws only, but it did need screws, 2, infringer could make two or three drawer using the same way, then what claims should I draft, IT CAN BE USED FOR SEVERAL DRAWERS??? thank you so much.

Hi, I have some basic question and it's appreciated that you or someone could answer it, suppose I invent a drawer - furniture, 1, should I write mounting the screws process, the drawer will use screw but common screws only, but it did need screws, 2, infringer could make two or three drawer using the same way, then what claims should I draft, IT CAN BE USED FOR SEVERAL DRAWERS??? thank you so much.

Amazing video!

Hi, are you still a practising patent attorney and do you have contact details? Thanks.

Very well done series of videos. God Bless you. They have helped out and guided me for years.

Bless you Sir

I love what I've heard so far keep up the great work!

The OBAMA care 2014. & My thuong mai dien tu dien toan dam may is cau ket Microsoft’s amazing twet mobile yahoo Verizon Facebook account bank HQ INC development cau ket FPT OTO camudivi Zing me vng vn China alibaba group Hacks website Facebook account bank hack the world bank trade max China groups also of trade group hacks the Dmca Wipo trips technology watch Nobel game also 2014

Hey i create high quality tutorials on Patent search and Intellectual Property on Udemy and on my website. If you want to find further and deeper information please visit my Website! patent-academy.com/

Enjoyed the real voice recordings of court proceedings

#Awarded

Very helpful

Why do Americans pronounce "patent" wrongly?

Are you open to reviewing a patent and a ipr case? I'd be willing hire you.

USPTO is one of the government allowed scams to bulk inventors out of there money. You'll see.

Beautiful

very slow presentation.

best of the best

Thank you for this informative video! I'm a freelance animator, and I'm planning on producing content that would bring me residual income via royalties.

very help thank you, i was usprised that someone could patent a stuff toy with treat inside but once i read it again, they put a " flag" comprising a treat pocket, it changes it all, not surprising they put it in the end.

How is a claim related to an embodiment?

Thanks, great explanation. for example in this patent, where I could find more information about claims? pdfpiw.uspto.gov/.piw?PageNum=0&docid=D0810656&IDKey=1215898C23A7&HomeU

What happens if you forget to add claim 1 in your patent infringement lawsuit? Should you add all claims in a lawsuit?

9:48, that's also false. The claim says "A bottle opening device for wearing on a wrist and a hand". The word "for" means suitable for. That is, can perform the function without modification. The device you've shown is not only being worn on the hand, which meets the claim, and it is clearly suitable for being worn on a wrist. So that is also clearly infringement.

At 9:19, that's not true. Configured to means "suitable for", as in can perform the function without modification. Further, the term "wristband" has undefined scope. There is no size associated with a wristband.

In other words, "they limited themselves in the claim by being too specific."

Hey. This is me, Shannon. We talked at Seattle UA-cam Meetup today. Love your voiceover. You should keep making videos.

Very helpful, Thanks!! but based on your number of views Google probably paid you about $10. so where is your profits? would you do it again?

can i patent my kids bevaise of government kidnapping

Thumbs UP :-)

What happens if the USPTO Examiner does not read, write or speak English?

I'm in the process of writing my patent with the pure intention of licensing it out to an existing industry. Surely the simpler and "overall covering" a claim is the more watertight the claim is too. I mean the more one attempts details the more one restricts oneself to a particular principle of operation of the device making it easy for anyone to copy and claim something similar and simply use other details. I mean, take a car for example, one would simply describe a car as a functional device powering 4 wheels etc and not stress the use of gasoline as a propulsion method, where then anyone else then can infringe claiming they are using Diesel, and therefore not infringing (as an extremely crude example of the principle) ??

Good stuff.

Am i right that just 1 independent claim infringed results in infringement and its not required that EVERY independent claim is infringed to result in an infringement?

Thank you sir. Very informative.

Massive help. the only help I have actually got of the internet so far, the rest is utter bullshit. Thank you.

This is an excellent training tool. Thanks for explaining so simplistically about the various aspects of "Patent Claims". I have an invention I am creating and found a similar patent. The drawings are not the same as what my product will look like, however, the claims have covered so much of how I would write a claim for my product. I will compare the claims to the detailed description. Thanks for sharing.

Good job!

Informative video! Am i right to say, there is no infringement when patent B only has 1 claim less than patent A where patent B was filed later than patent A since all but 1 claim is identical or similar?

Love the videos though thank you!

What about products that are identical? For example an Under Armour shirt, now NiKe, Adidas, and everyone else has an under shirt. Aren't those patented? That's the part that is most confusing. In your example the band could not go on the wrist, but a shirt has to be put on, so how can Nike and Adidas make the same exact shirt as under Armour?

i forgot to mention how scary this video actually is . how could i ever defend myself against financial giants

Great information! This is exactly the type of language and information I was seeking to confirm questions about my particular patent. Your video presentation was concise and to the point. I was actually excited watching the presentation because of the knowledge you brought forth appeared like this video was tailored for me specifically. Lol. Well done, Sir... Your work is well appreciated. Thank you.

helpful ! ! !