![Patent Basics](/img/default-banner.jpg)
- 9
- 139 062
Patent Basics
Приєднався 26 кві 2013
Demystifying patents - one video at a time...
A series of short videos on patent law basics - and playlists of videos done by others that I think are helpful.
Business people and inventors should know a few basics - without getting caught up with the details. Without much work a non-lawyer can be "close enough" 80% of the time (something I shouldn't say as an attorney). Being "close enough" is a lot better than being "completely off base" - you can always hire an attorney to get that last 20%.
I am starting with concepts that have come up most often in the past 20+ years; feel free to suggest new ones.
Remember: This is not specific legal advice. Never take specific legal advice from UA-cam or a podcast!
A series of short videos on patent law basics - and playlists of videos done by others that I think are helpful.
Business people and inventors should know a few basics - without getting caught up with the details. Without much work a non-lawyer can be "close enough" 80% of the time (something I shouldn't say as an attorney). Being "close enough" is a lot better than being "completely off base" - you can always hire an attorney to get that last 20%.
I am starting with concepts that have come up most often in the past 20+ years; feel free to suggest new ones.
Remember: This is not specific legal advice. Never take specific legal advice from UA-cam or a podcast!
Straws
A look at patents on drinking straws.
The history is a long and tells a story of changing needs and materials - typical in the history of invention.
The history is a long and tells a story of changing needs and materials - typical in the history of invention.
Переглядів: 101
Відео
Patent Basics (7) - Royalty Rates
Переглядів 5 тис.10 років тому
Factors used in setting patent royalty rates are identified; focusing on the Georgia Pacific Factors.
Patent Basics (6) - Royalty Calculations
Переглядів 10 тис.10 років тому
A basic patent royalty calculation is demonstrated and the components explained. Issues related non-US patents are identified. The old "25% Rule" is discussed...(don't tell anyone)...
Patent Basics (5) - Lost Profits
Переглядів 4,7 тис.10 років тому
Patent infringement damages can include an award of lost profits - the factors used by courts to measure that award are reviewed. For more information, I like: "Calculating Lost profits in IP and Patent Infringement cases", editor Nancy J. Fannon, BVR Portland OR, 2009 edition ISBN: 978-1-935081-27-2
Patent Basics (4) - Indemnity
Переглядів 7 тис.11 років тому
Indemnity - a common contract term - can change who is responding to an infringement claim. Often overlooked, it can be a game changer when it comes to handling assertions.
Patent Basics (3) - Patent Litigation Costs and Judgments
Переглядів 10 тис.11 років тому
Patent lawsuits are not always profitable; this video reviews the statistics. Patent lawsuits for royalties, for market share and by "trolls" are discussed.
Patent Basics (2) - The File History
Переглядів 15 тис.11 років тому
Inventors statements when applying for a patent, can impact the interpretation of the patent later. A "file history estoppel" example is explained.
Patent Basics (1) - Understanding a Claim
Переглядів 86 тис.11 років тому
Understanding a patent claim is the first step in understanding patents ............a quick tutorial by a 20 year veteran.
Should've gone for the design patents in first case
Wow … such a cool and illuminating video … thank you ❤
Thank you . This was really valuable
Intervention quand il le faut
I hope.you get back into making videos and still read chat. A video on Tesla would be good because they focus on product and service and open patent agreement.
I would Ike to see a video on Ford and Tesla. Ford holds the most innovations in the form of patents in cars. While Tesla makes a lot of f patents in car design open or free. Does that make Tesla the most over inflated stock in the car market. There the only two major car manufacturers to never be bailed out by the US government. The interesting thing about Ford and the GFC is they survived. We're they receiving royalties from other car manufacturers when other manufacturers were having defaults on there finance operations. If so what would happen to Tesla if we went through another financial crisis. Tesla now have starlink how does that work is erikson claiming the mobile phone royalties on that. Also IBM being the company with the most patents and doesn't even produce end products and services it just focuses on innovation and design invention. Your really good at making videos I would like to hear some input on these companies.
Hi, I have some basic question and it's appreciated that you or someone could answer it, suppose I invent a drawer - furniture, 1, should I write mounting the screws process, the drawer will use screw but common screws only, but it did need screws, 2, infringer could make two or three drawer using the same way, then what claims should I draft, IT CAN BE USED FOR SEVERAL DRAWERS??? thank you so much.
Don't add screw in claims just add "a fastening mechanism" and add "a plurality of drawers"
@@blackheart6288 thank you Sir, it's helpful
@@firstime get patentability search done for your invention before drafting the patent application, it will help during prosecution of the application
Hi, I have some basic question and it's appreciated that you or someone could answer it, suppose I invent a drawer - furniture, 1, should I write mounting the screws process, the drawer will use screw but common screws only, but it did need screws, 2, infringer could make two or three drawer using the same way, then what claims should I draft, IT CAN BE USED FOR SEVERAL DRAWERS??? thank you so much.
Amazing video!
Hi, are you still a practising patent attorney and do you have contact details? Thanks.
Very well done series of videos. God Bless you. They have helped out and guided me for years.
Bless you Sir
I love what I've heard so far keep up the great work!
The OBAMA care 2014. & My thuong mai dien tu dien toan dam may is cau ket Microsoft’s amazing twet mobile yahoo Verizon Facebook account bank HQ INC development cau ket FPT OTO camudivi Zing me vng vn China alibaba group Hacks website Facebook account bank hack the world bank trade max China groups also of trade group hacks the Dmca Wipo trips technology watch Nobel game also 2014
Hey i create high quality tutorials on Patent search and Intellectual Property on Udemy and on my website. If you want to find further and deeper information please visit my Website! patent-academy.com/
Enjoyed the real voice recordings of court proceedings
#Awarded
Very helpful
Why do Americans pronounce "patent" wrongly?
#bekAse Mathematik!
Are you open to reviewing a patent and a ipr case? I'd be willing hire you.
USPTO is one of the government allowed scams to bulk inventors out of there money. You'll see.
Beautiful
very slow presentation.
Ever heard of playback speed??
best of the best
Thank you for this informative video! I'm a freelance animator, and I'm planning on producing content that would bring me residual income via royalties.
very help thank you, i was usprised that someone could patent a stuff toy with treat inside but once i read it again, they put a " flag" comprising a treat pocket, it changes it all, not surprising they put it in the end.
How is a claim related to an embodiment?
Thanks, great explanation. for example in this patent, where I could find more information about claims? pdfpiw.uspto.gov/.piw?PageNum=0&docid=D0810656&IDKey=1215898C23A7&HomeU
What happens if you forget to add claim 1 in your patent infringement lawsuit? Should you add all claims in a lawsuit?
9:48, that's also false. The claim says "A bottle opening device for wearing on a wrist and a hand". The word "for" means suitable for. That is, can perform the function without modification. The device you've shown is not only being worn on the hand, which meets the claim, and it is clearly suitable for being worn on a wrist. So that is also clearly infringement.
At 9:19, that's not true. Configured to means "suitable for", as in can perform the function without modification. Further, the term "wristband" has undefined scope. There is no size associated with a wristband.
In other words, "they limited themselves in the claim by being too specific."
Hey. This is me, Shannon. We talked at Seattle UA-cam Meetup today. Love your voiceover. You should keep making videos.
Thanks Shannon - I've got one coming up and look forward the next meeting.
Very helpful, Thanks!! but based on your number of views Google probably paid you about $10. so where is your profits? would you do it again?
Yes, I'd do it again. These are common questions I'm answering. Its a lot easier to do it via video than doing it in person!
can i patent my kids bevaise of government kidnapping
Thumbs UP :-)
What happens if the USPTO Examiner does not read, write or speak English?
I'm in the process of writing my patent with the pure intention of licensing it out to an existing industry. Surely the simpler and "overall covering" a claim is the more watertight the claim is too. I mean the more one attempts details the more one restricts oneself to a particular principle of operation of the device making it easy for anyone to copy and claim something similar and simply use other details. I mean, take a car for example, one would simply describe a car as a functional device powering 4 wheels etc and not stress the use of gasoline as a propulsion method, where then anyone else then can infringe claiming they are using Diesel, and therefore not infringing (as an extremely crude example of the principle) ??
The independent claim should be broad - dependent claims narrowing. That helps both for claim interpretation and later validity attacks on the independent claim. In your example, the independent claim could state "propulsion method" and independent claims could state "The invention of claim 1, where the propulsion method is a diesel engine". After the patent issues if someone finds prior art that shows a general "propulsion method", you can assert the dependent claim of a diesel engine - is the accused device uses it.
Good stuff.
Am i right that just 1 independent claim infringed results in infringement and its not required that EVERY independent claim is infringed to result in an infringement?
That's correct
Thank you sir. Very informative.
Massive help. the only help I have actually got of the internet so far, the rest is utter bullshit. Thank you.
This is an excellent training tool. Thanks for explaining so simplistically about the various aspects of "Patent Claims". I have an invention I am creating and found a similar patent. The drawings are not the same as what my product will look like, however, the claims have covered so much of how I would write a claim for my product. I will compare the claims to the detailed description. Thanks for sharing.
what is the invention?
Good job!
Informative video! Am i right to say, there is no infringement when patent B only has 1 claim less than patent A where patent B was filed later than patent A since all but 1 claim is identical or similar?
One patent does not infringe other patent. It's the product that infringes a patent.
Love the videos though thank you!
What about products that are identical? For example an Under Armour shirt, now NiKe, Adidas, and everyone else has an under shirt. Aren't those patented? That's the part that is most confusing. In your example the band could not go on the wrist, but a shirt has to be put on, so how can Nike and Adidas make the same exact shirt as under Armour?
Because if there is any such patent, it must have been long time ago, and it must have been dead way long ago
i forgot to mention how scary this video actually is . how could i ever defend myself against financial giants
...patent laws ebb & recede...looks like we're receeding now. Post issuance patent challenges are knocking out issued patents at somthing like 90% invalid presently. Its not much comfort, but the reality of big companies going after small ones is pretty rare - at least with patents, not so with TM.
Patent Basics i see , nice to know people can actually forecast a trial like that . my biggest problem is that i have to many ideas , i simply cant pin one down at the moment , im swept away by the next huge idea leaving the old fling unattended . my biggest regret was not finishing my laser manisfester idea, its now a process called cinterd metal 3D printing :(
Great information! This is exactly the type of language and information I was seeking to confirm questions about my particular patent. Your video presentation was concise and to the point. I was actually excited watching the presentation because of the knowledge you brought forth appeared like this video was tailored for me specifically. Lol. Well done, Sir... Your work is well appreciated. Thank you.
Thanks!
helpful ! ! !
Thanks - I'm working on another set of videos related to monetization....